CONTACT: 973-562-0100 | TEXT: 973-333-2037

Admitting an Unsigned Will to New Jersey Probate Court

In the Matter of the Estate of Albertha Blackwell

2011 N.J. Super. Unpub. LEXIS 1432

Often, people unfortunately pass without completing a will.

This can often have devastating effects on his/her estate and the loved ones s/he leaves behind.

The laws regarding admitting wills to New Jersey probate courts is very rigid.  Most often, a will is not admitted to New Jersey probate court if it is not entirely complete and executed in conformity with the laws.

The rigidity of these laws fail to recognize a quite common reality: people often try to put their wishes into a will or a document s/he hopes is a will but, often, do not get the chance to finish it before s/he dies.

Below is a summary of a recent decision showing that the courts are moving away from this rigidity and may be starting to recognize the realities of most people’s estate planning.

Issue

Whether a document purported to be the Last Will and Testament of Albertha Blackwell may be admitted to a New Jersey probate court?

Hold

The document is the last will and testament of Albertha Blackwell and is admitted to probate.

Facts

  • Albertha died at 76 with 6 adult children, 7 adult grandchildren and 1 minor grandchild.
  • Two of the decedent’s daughters filed a caveat to the probate of any Will. Defendant
  • The Plaintiff filed an order to show cause and verified complaint seeking to probate an undated document as the Last Will and Testament of Decedent.
  • Will admitted to probate, despite lack of attestation because there was no evidence that the signature was not decedent’s.
  • On appeal, the court reversed saying the will did not strictly comply with N.J.S.A. 3B:3-2.
  • The document had 5 pages each signed by Albertha and on the 5th page a second signature saying the will is 6 pages and that she is signing freely and voluntarily, she is at least 18 and of sound mind. The will is not dated and there is not attestation clause.
  • Appended is the 6th page with language similar to a self-proving affidavit where 2 women signed that each witnessed Albetha sign, she is at least 18, did it willingly etc. The page is notarized. The acknowledgment is not dated.

Rule

A will does not need to strictly comply with NJSA 3B:3-2 so long as there is clear and convincing evidence has established that the Will is both in substantial compliance with NJSA 3B:3-2, and was intended to constitute the parties will, pursuant to NJSA 3B:3-3.

Analysis

The will is not in strict compliance with NJSA 3B:3-2 but the Plaintiff’s have proven, by clear and convincing evidence that the will substantially complied with the statutory requirement. It was proven Albertha signed it voluntarily; that the witnesses signed the self-proving affidavit and witnessed her signature. This is not strict compliance with NJSA 3B:3-2. Further, defendant did not put any evidence forth that would show that the signature was fake. Only her own testimony, no expert. Nothing in the statute requires a date. Thus finding no date to be a clerical error/harmless oversight. Trial testimony found the will to be signed March 1, 2007.

Recent Blogs